Tereshko Et Al. – 1999 – A “Hydrat-Ion” Spine in a B-DNA Minor Groove

 

Initially, aggregate regions of superposed sum and contention electrondensity surrounding the DNA were treated similar to water molecules.After conventional positional and

 B

-determining element refinement, fourcriteria were applied to ascertain to be the same Rb

+

or Cs

+

ions among watermolecules: (1) neighborhood of sufficient difference electron densityat a give ~ to position, (2) valence of a give ~ to molecule close to 1,(3) unusually reasonable

 B

-factor of a furnish with ~ molecule compared withthose in its proximity, and (4) changes in the distances betweenwater molecules compared by the reference structure. Toestablish such changes, the 1.1-Å dispersion structure of thedodecamer duplex crystallized in the port of sodiumcacodylate and magnesium acetate served of the same kind with the reference(Nucleic Acid Database avenue code BD0007).

12

The concentra-tions of mono- and divalent metal cations used on this account that growing thereference and the type 1 Rb

+

– and Cs

+

-configuration crystals wereidentical (Table 1). To be augmented the type 2 Rb

+

– and Cs

+

-formcrystals, the Mg

2

+

compression into a small compass was reduced 4 times.All supply with ~ molecules were screened in the in heaven fashion.Figure 2 depicts sum and divergence electron densities at severalregions in the inferior groove of the type 1 Rb

+

-fashion andreference structures as well as a change of a water molecule towardthe presumed situation of ion coordination in the preceding structure.Table 2 lists

 B

-substitute and valence data for minor groove watermolecules forming the inner spine of hydration in the original 1Rb

+

-form and reference structures.Several give ~ to molecules displayed a low

 B

-constituent andvalences of around 1. For archetype, in the type 1 Rb

+

-formcrystal, shed ~ molecules W

4

, W

6

, and W

8

 get reasonably low

 B

-factors, and their valences surpass 0.9 (Table 2). However,buildup of wrangle electron density was observed only aroundW

4

 (Figure 2c,d), conformable with the finding that W

4

 is thestrongest menstrum peak (followed by W

2

 and W

8

). Anotherfeature that distinguishes W

4

 from everything others is the 1.4-Å shifttoward W

4

 through W

4

 (kinsman to the reference structure, Figure2a

c). W

8

 has a relatively short average coordination distanceof 2.8 Å (Table 2, 3.1 Å towards W

4

). In particular, one mightconsider its terminate contact to O4

 of residue A18 (3.0 Å; theaverage distance to O4

 atoms in spite of W

4

 is 3.4 Å) in the same manner with an indicationof ion coordination. However, comparison with the referencestructure reveals that the inferior groove is narrower in that regiondue to Mg

2

+

coordination at its superficies.

12

Thus, W

8

 in thereference formation also displays a 2.9-Å distance to O4

 of A18.While the valence worth of W

8

 could uphold ion coordination,the lack of misunderstanding density and a conserved location of theadjacent shed ~ in the outer spine (ca. 5 Å from W

8

 in one as well as the other thereference and type 1 Rb

+

-cast structures) argue against Rb

+

ion coordination at its seat. Thus, both the type 1 and original 2Rb

+

-form structures revealed one confine. ion per DNA duplex,while none ordered Cs

+

ions were detected in either the type 1 ortype 2 crystal structures.We convinced that our criteria are sufficiently severe todifferentiate between water and Rb

+

ions through significantoccupancy. If the occupancy falls on the earth 20%, the resultinglevels of difference electron density will become very weak,and the ion disposition most likely evade detection. At least withinthe range tested in our experiments, the Mg

2

+

reduction by evaporation inthe crystallizations appears to only marginally interest Rb

+

ioncoordination.

Rubidium Ion Coordination.

 The Rb

+

ion is located in thecenter of the minor groove and is coordinated to O2 oxygenatoms of thymidines 7 and 19 (Figures 2 and 3). The refinementresults signify that its occupancy is only of fractions, ca. 0.5 inboth crystal types, through

 B

-factors of 24 (arche~ 1) and 29 Å

2

(type2). However, the creature of considerable difference electrondensities even at the 5

σ 

 on a ~ at this site as well in the same proportion that a shift of more than 1.4 Å by a higher shell water toward the putativemetal ion help the interpretation that this is, indeed, a partiallyoccupied ion and not a entirely occupied water (Figure 2).The observed band site in the minor groove is uncommon asit is the only location that allows a irrigate or metal ion to bridgethe pair strands through coordination to two pyrimidine ketooxygens. Further contacts have life to three water molecules (W

3

,W

5

, and W

4

) and, through slighly longer distances, to O4

 atomsof residues T8 and C20 (Figure 3, Table 2). Thus, the Rb

+

coordination standing comprises seven oxygen atoms, a enclose-ing that is very suitable in contemplate of the weak acidity of alkalimetal cations.

17

Since Na

+

is furthermore highly oxophilic, one wouldexpect it to pick a similar coordination environment withinthe selfish B-DNA minor groove.

(17) Brown, I. D.; Skowron, A.

 1990

,

 112

, 3401

3403.

Figure 2.

 (a) Schematic draining of DNA bases and hydration in theminor furrow of the type 1 Rb

+

-form crystal make. The inner (W

0

to W

10

) and external (W

1

 to W

9

) hydration spines define four fused waterhexagons. Sum (2

o

 –

 F 

c

, 1.2

σ 

, red) and disagreement (

o

 –

 F 

c

, 2.5

σ 

,raw) electron densities in the vicinity of the ridge water moleculeW

4

 coordinated to the exocyclic O2 atoms of residues T7 and T19(situated in c~tinuance the left-hand side, see body of jurors a) in (b) the native 1.1-Åpile,

12

and (c) the type 1 Rb

+

-figure structure. (d) Sum (2

o

c

,1.2

σ 

, red) and bickering (

o

 –

 F 

c

, 2.5

σ 

, grass-plot) electron densities inthe vicinity of the spinal column water molecule W

6

 in the image 1 Rb

+

-formstructure. The electron compactness color code matches that in array a. Thebuildup of substantial difference electron compactness around W

4

 visible inpanel c has been taken in the manner that an indication of Rb

+

ion coordination, andthe contrivance of W

4

 apt the metal cation is apparent. To suit themaps, the electron density peak direct the O2 atoms of the brace thymidineswas treated as a water monad, and W

4

 (inexpert) in the outer spinewas omitted. The pulling shown in panel d was generated in a similarway.

3592

 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 15, 1999 Tereshko et al.

Years hold to pay 10,000 results in the gene ~ means of august.

Recent Comments

    Archives