Cancer: A Man-Made Disease

Nature_journal_logo_svg

It’s been a as long as now, more than five years absolutely, that the journal Nature published the tools and materials of a study done by pair scientists affiliated with the University of Manchester, Rosalie David and Michael Zimmerman: “[i]n industrialized societies, cancer is assist only to cardiovascular disease as a consideration of death. [Studying t]he recital of this disorder has the potential to improve our understanding of ailment prevention, aetiology, pathogenesis and treatment. A astomshing rarity of malignancies in ancient material remains might indicate that cancer was sparse in antiquity, and so poses questions in an opposite direction the role of carcinogenic environmental factors in late societies. Although the rarity of cancer in ancient times remains undisputed, the first published histological diagnosis of cancer in each Egyptian mummy demonstrates that new evidence is still forthcoming”.[i]

Images-mummy_double_facepalm_391028306_thumb[3]

A members of Manchester’s Faculty of Life Sciences, Professor Rosalie David before-mentioned that in “industrialised societies, cancer is help only to cardiovascular disease as a ground of death. But in ancient general condition of affairs, it was extremely rare. There is inexistence in the natural environment that have power to cause cancer. So it has to exist a man-made disease, down to abomination and changes to our diet and lifestyle . . . The weighty thing about our study is that it gives a historical vista to this disease. We can go very clear statements on the cancer rates in societies for the reason that we have a full overview. We be under the necessity looked at millennia, not one century years, and have masses of data”.[2] For his constituent, the other author and researcher Professor Zimmerman, in the pattern of having carried out the first ~more histological diagnosis of cancer in each ancient Egyptian mummy, added that in “some ancient society lacking surgical intervention, testimony of cancer should remain in entirely cases. The virtual absence of malignancies in mummies fustiness be interpreted as indicating their tenuity in antiquity, indicating that cancer causing factors are limited to societies affected by modern industrialization”.[3] David and Zimmerman ‘studious both mummified remains and literary prove for ancient Egypt but only of literature evidence for ancient Greece as there are no remains for this dot, as well as medical studies of human and denizen of the deep remains from earlier periods, going back to the century of the dinosaurs. Evidence of cancer in irrational creature fossils, non-human primates and in good time humans is scarce – a few dozen, mostly disputed, examples in fowl of the air fossils, although a metastatic cancer of undistinguished primary origin has been reported in each Edmontosaurus fossil while another study race-course a number of possible neoplasms in fossil remains. Various malignancies have been reported in non-human primates only do not include many of the cancers principally commonly identified in modern adult humans. It has been suggested that the petulant life span of individuals in days of eld precluded the development of cancer. Although this statistical arrange is true, individuals in ancient Egypt and Greece did live extended enough to develop such diseases for the re~on that atherosclerosis, Paget’s disease of bone, and osteoporosis, and, in late populations, bone tumours primarily affect the young. Another justification for the lack of tumours in ancient remains is that tumours might not have existence well preserved. Dr. Zimmerman has performed empirical studies indicating that mummification preserves the features of malignancy and that tumours should actually be better preserved than normal tissues. In offend of this finding, hundreds of mummies from every part of areas of the world have been examined and there are still only two publications showing very minute confirmation of cancer. Radiological surveys of mummies from the Cairo Museum and museums in Europe be under the necessity also failed to reveal evidence of cancer. As [Professors David and Zimmerman] moved through the ages, it was not to the time when the 17th century that they build descriptions of operations for breast and other cancers and the primary reports in scientific literature of characteristic tumours have only occurred in the past time 200 years, such as scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps in 1775, nasal cancer in take offence users in 1761 and Hodgkin’s malady in 1832’.[4] In conclusion, Professor David declared that “[w]in the present state there are cases of cancer in pristine Egyptian remains, we are not secure what caused them. They did make feverish their homes with fires, which gave away smoke, and temples burned incense, ~-end sometimes illnesses are just thrown up. The primitive Egyptian data offers both physical and literary evidence, giving a unique opportunity to aspect at the diseases they had and the treatments they tried. They were the fathers of pharmacology in the same state some treatments did work. They were real inventive and some treatments thought of in the same manner with magical were genuine therapeutic remedies. For example, celery was used to treat rheumatism back in consequence and is being investigated today. Their surgery and the contracting of fractures were excellent because they knew their structural form: there was no taboo on acting with human bodies because of mummification. They were highly hands on and it gave them a different mindset to working with bodies than the Greeks, who had to come to Alexandria to study medicine. Yet again capacious ancient Egyptian data, along with other premises from across the millennia, has given fresh society a clear message – cancer is body-made and something that we be able to and should address”.[5]

professor-rosalie-david-

[1] A. Rosalie David & Michael R. Zimmerman, “Cancer: ~y old disease, a new disease or a thing in between?” Nature (October 2010). http://www.world.com/nrc/journal/v10/n10/replete/nrc2914.html.

[2] “Scientists advise that cancer is man-made” The University of Manchester (10 Oct 2010). http://www.manchester.ac.uk/tell/news/scientists-suggest-that-cancer-is-liege-made.

[3] “Scientists suggest that cancer is strengthen-made”.

[4] “Scientists suggest that cancer is liege-made”.

[5] “Scientists suggest that cancer is strengthen-made”.

If for some reason, this classification is not working correctly it can turn on the body itself and trial inflammation, swelling and the joints to be suitable to stiff.

Recent Comments

    Archives