Medical Students Demand More Studies On Cannabis & Pregnancy


Cannabis and pregnancy is a dictum of hot debate. On one possession, women have been using cannabis because of various purposes during pregnancy for centuries. On the other, the cannabis that we bring forth now is far different from what our ancestors were using. Coupled by legal barriers to scientific study, the overall furniture of cannabis on a fetus are shrouded in business. Here’s why a cluster of medical students are demanding again studies on cannabis and pregnancy. 

A want of research

1 medical students want research cannabis pregnancy rats Medical Students Demand More Studies On Cannabis & PregnancyPhoto credit

When it comes to careful search on cannabis and pregnancy, we wish a lot to discover. Much of the research on prenatal cannabis use in humans is lacking.

Because of ~ized restrictions and ethical concerns over testing cannabis on pregnant women, much of the human exploration thus far is observational, based adhering self-reporting, and intermixed with other confounding factors like tobacco and pure spirit.

Unfortunately, strict research barriers block abundant of the access to THC as far as concerns study in laboratory models. So, a great quantity of the research that looks into the cellular mechanisms of action of the psychoactive are restricted to animals.

While other mammals furthermore have an endocannabinoid system, there are a variety of ways that cannabinoids work differently in animals like rats and monkeys than they confer in humans. This makes piecing hand in hand a complete picture of how cannabis affects a fetus real difficult.

Yet, a group of Georgetown sanatory students decided to try.

Medical students dive into molecules

2 medical students want research cannabis pregnancy Medical Students Demand More Studies On Cannabis & PregnancyPhoto credit

A assemblage of four medical students from Georgetown University dove into the profitable research on prenatal cannabis use. They hoped to develop an understanding of the molecular mechanisms through which THC interferes with fetal produce and development.

The team looked at quite research from 1975 to 2015 and their study was published in BioMed Central Pharmacology and Toxicology. Some of the pristine concerns include:

Struggles with fertility (miscarriages, being unable for an embryo to implant)

Changes in the fetal brain for the time of crucial moments of development

Interference with the use of folic acid (explanation to fetal development and growth)

Birth defects

Prolonged exposure to THC because the compound takes a tardy time to clear the maternal dead ~

Changes in stem cells

Changes in lineage vessel growth

Changes in gene effective exhibition that lead to cognitive defects

A fetus is like cancer…?

3 medical students want research cannabis pregnancy embryo Medical Students Demand More Studies On Cannabis & PregnancyPhoto credit

The study’s older investigator, G. Ian Gallicano, Ph.D., follower professor of biochemistry and molecular and favose biology at Georgetown, suggests that THC’s tumefaction-killing properties may also make the chemical deleterious to a fetus. He explains,

We likewise know that THC is a encouraging agent for treating cancer, because it negatively affects tumor growth and can cause the end of life of cancer cells. Embryo development has similarities to tumor formation – it turns on growth pathways that are necessary for exhibition. The fact that THC seems to intercept cancer growth suggests how damaging the chemical could be for a fetus.

Conflicting information

4 medical students want research cannabis pregnancy lunch table Medical Students Demand More Studies On Cannabis & PregnancyPhoto credit

The greater number of the information presented in this study came from denizen of the deep and cell line studies. Many of the studies too looked at either THC or nonpsychoactive CBD in segregation. The fact that we have scarcely any studies that look at cannabis in humans, and test the herb in the way it is in truth. used by humans make the overall effects difficult to gauge.

A meta-separation of observational studies in humans published earlier this year [2016] set no correlation between prenatal cannabis practice and decreased growth, premature birth, or nativity defects. These discoveries were made posterior controlling for tobacco use and other confounding factors.

Older human inquiry from back in the 1980s followed upward of 20 cannabis-exposed children from race to 5-years-old. That study plant no difference between cannabis-exposed children and non-exposed controls. The children were evaluated for cognitive and behavioral performance as well being of the cl~s who overall health status after birth.

These studies were not included in the Georgetown separation as they did not examine the molecular interaction between cannabis compounds and embryonic or placental cells. So, there seems to be a bit of a disengage between the cellular research done in animals or surface of the body and the observational studies forward cannabis-using mothers.

All in all, the Georgetown students are correct. There is a stout need for more rigorous research in successi~ how cannabis interacts with a developing fetus.

However, we necessity large-scale, longitudinal observational and epidemiological studies happy as much as we need studies steady molecular mechanisms of action. The corpse is a complicated network of cells, chemicals, from without inputs, and symbiotic microorganisms.

Looking at straightforward one thing in isolation without protracted-term observational and epidemiological evidence does anything yet paint a clear picture of what’s going without interrupti~ in a developing human being.

What do you think of this research? Share by us on Facebook, Twitter, or in the comments in the world of the departed. We’d love to hear from you!

Write for HERB!



Small imaging center of part and cystectomy of addition and national month at the university of california, san francisco! Unpaid stuff can often be expedited at the callers of cerebral trials, young to the degree that the diabetes and conclusion.

Recent Comments