A Natural Experiment With Intellectual Property’s Original Intent Reaches a Milestone

November 17 th 2016 Comment

Share

Email

Twitter

Google+

Facebook

LinkedIn

Posted in:

Legal Publishing

Column

A Natural Experiment With Intellectual Property’s Original Intent Reaches a Milestone

~ means of John Willinsky

More posts by John »

In 2001, I and one undergraduate student at the University of British Columbia started each intellectual property experiment with the pristine intent of this area of jurisprudence. I didn’t think of it that mode of dealing at the time, but now that fifteen years own passed and the results of this imagined make ~ could be said to be in, I poverty to set it out here in those terms (warning: unabashed hubris to follow). What we note in motion in 2001 and require worked on steadily since then is a melodrama of software. I sketched out workflow and wrote the talk, while Kevin Jamieson wrote the code for the first iteration and therefore he graduated; he was followed ~ dint of. Alec Smecher, who has built a team that we respect to collectively as the Public Knowledge Project.

This fifteen-year proof has involved creating an environment in what one. intellectual property might be able to more useful serve its original legal purpose. Among English-declamation legal systems, the intent and purpose is maybe best captured in the U.S. constitutiol sentential term from 1787 that empowers the United States Congress “to encourage the Progress of Science and available Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the snobbish Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries” (1.8.8).

Our exact trial with intellectual property’s original meaning involved putting a number of principles to the standard. For example, cast in this dawn, we sought to assess if combining the suit of intellectual property law to various forms of human expression, such because writing computer code and reporting exploration results, could be mutually reinforcing in pathetic the promotion of science. That is, the model software package, which we called Open Journal Systems, was designed to horsemanship and publish peer-reviewed journal articles and issues.

We used our mental property rights with the software to site it under a GNU General Public License. This ensured that those who could not not so engage in this promotion and progress of information and the useful arts had the means to do so. We wrote into the collection of laws strong instructional support for installing and operating the hypothesis to further lower the barriers that power otherwise retard such progress. And on that account we encouraged those who published journals using the software to conversion to an act a Creative Commons license for the published articles of examination and scholarship. This licensing would obstruct restrictions in these publications promoting more remote work.

We extended the experiment ~ the agency of testing whether public funds, principally from one side Canadian research grants, and tax-exempt funds through private foundations, could subsist redirected toward preserving and extending the cause concerns of intellectual property in ways that power not otherwise happen.

The results of this examination are ongoing, but a significant milestone has been reached and some conclusions warranted. After fifteen years, Open Journal Systems has had 44 releases, through each upgrading the quality of publishing (through the continuing support of that funding), bringing us, put ~ August 31, 2016, to OJS 3.0, representing a third part generation of the software. But the real proof for this natural experiment resides in the takeup and appliance of the software. In 2015, the numeral of active journals, publishing ten or greater degree items during the year (with one average of 42 overall), exceeded 10,000 titles since the first time.

Latin America and the Caribbean enumeration for 3,289 journals, making it the largest neighborhood of use, with 60 percent of the journals are published in the Global South. Brazil alone has 1,934 journals. The software is beneficial in Spanish, Portuguese, and French, amidst the 32 languages into which users accept translated the software. There is the Holos Environment published ~ dint of. São Paulo State and the Jonathan Edwards Studies Journal at Yale; the Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment located in Kathmandu, and Canadian Journal of Sociology at the University of Alberta. The Indonesian Journal of Pharmacology is published by Gadjah Mada University in Indonesia, and the International Journal of Žižek Studies resides at Leeds University. The allotment of the journals geographically, as well since their openness and specialization of the topics, is member of the promotion of that progress adhering the global scale within which pertaining property operates today.

We take this product and distribution to affirm the real results for each of the elements in this mental property experiment with the law’s inventive intent. The law’s application to the one and the other code and prose, with the preserve of public and tax-exempt funding, has acted for the re~on that an incentive, in the original vivacity of intellectual property law, to help the progress of the sciences and the profitable arts. These are but preliminary results, eminent by the passing of an first letter milestone. They are encouraging results, especially whereas you consider the number of people involved around the world with those 10,000 journals, entirely of them participating, if inadvertently, in this make ~ in determining the future of of the understanding property law’s original intent.

The Count

14,288 posts and 18,600 comments

Most Recent Comments

Omar Ha-Redeye attached Legal Ethics: Misleading the Court:

There is a haphazard of dirt out there. And reporting is unfortunately each imperfect solution. more »

Omar Ha-Redeye without ceasing How Political Can a Judge Get?:

Peggie, This is that which Reid Rusonik of Rusonik, O’Connor, Robbins, Ross, Gorham & Angelini, LLP had to… more »

Kim attached Researching the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Canada:

What a chivalrous list, Lyo. Thanks for mentioning the UVic guides. We recently unpublished two as… more »

Robert Semenoff on Legal Ethics: Misleading the Court:

Reporting any other lawyer would seem to be the sine qua non of acknowledgment self-regulation. more »

+ –

Recent Columns

Legal Publishing

A Natural Experiment With Intellectual Property’s Original Intent Reaches a Milestone

~ the agency of John Willinsky • November 17th, 2016

Justice Issues

Protecting the Free Speech of Charities in Canada

~ means of Jessica Clogg • November 16th, 2016

Legal Marketing

Should Digital Marketing Be Important to Lawyers?

by Lynn Foley • November 16th, 2016

Intellectual Property

Impending Importance of Patent Office Procedures to Canadian Patent Litigation?

by Paula Bremner • November 16th, 2016

Practice of Law

Idiot Lights

~ the agency of Steven B. Levy • November 15th, 2016

Legal Information

Fall Information Update From Washington, DC

through Judith Gaskell • November 14th, 2016

Legal Education

The Profession and the Academy Reconnect About Legal Education

~ means of Doug Ferguson • November 11th, 2016

Legal Information

Researching the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Canada

~ dint of. Lyonette Louis-Jacques • November 10th, 2016

Intellectual Property

Additional Deference in the Federal Court

through Alan Macek • November 9th, 2016

Legal Technology

Trade Agreements to Promote Electronic Commerce

~ the agency of John Gregory • November 8th, 2016

All Columns »

Slaw Columns

Dispute Resolution

Intellectual Property

Justice Issues

Legal Education

Legal Ethics

Legal Information

Legal Marketing

Legal Publishing

Legal Technology

Practice of Law

Today

Summaries Sunday

Monday’s Mix

Tips Tuesday

Wednesday: What’s Hot in c~tinuance CanLII

Thursday Thinkpiece

The Friday Fillip

It blocks the 2 neurotransmitters from conscious re-up taken.

Recent Comments

    Archives